Letters Page

 

   

Dear Editor,

 

I am writing to highlight the increased need for publicly owned energy companies as part of a National strategy for energy provision, pricing and investment into renewables. I am a member of an Energy Co-operative in Scotland, “The Great Glen Energy Co-op”, which was set up in the Autumn last year and has been operating at near full capacity since November 2008. The principle idea of the creation of the co-op was for local residents to have a stake in the wind farm north of the hills in Inver Garry. There are presently 16 Nordex Turbines at the site.

 The wind farm was developed by Falck renewables who offered a stake in the farm to Energy4all, a local energy co-op to buy a share in the site. Falck renewables are the only company in the Country who offer any shares in renewable projects to co-operatives. Albeit a step in the right direction the share offer only allows for a 4% royalty instrument purchase of the project development cost. With a publicly owned energy company or banking system however the share offer to local residents could and should be much higher.

Nonetheless Energy4all selected a board of directors from the community and who then launched a share offer to local residents. Unlike commercial shares, each one is offered at a nominal value of £1 and cannot be traded on the stock market. In return for the Co-op investment Falck undertakes to guarantee a minimum gross return of 6.6% per annum for the 25 year term of the project, to repay capital raised in the share offer at the end of the project, and to pay ongoing administration costs of coop participation. A substantial grant is available from the National grid to provide green energy, and energy companies built some of the connection equipment allowing energy to be transferred to the national grid.

 In my opinion such schemes of diversity of ownership of resources should be encouraged and follows the lead taken by cooperatives in countries such as Denmark. This project is however in its infancy. Falck is fairly new to the renewables sector and the share offered to Energy4all is a small percentage of the total capital, which is decided by Falck. This highlights the need for a publicly owned energy company which could offer much larger stakes to cooperatives such as Energy4all. In addition a publicly owned energy company would provide energy at reasonable rates to the National Grid within a National framework to keep energy bills low for ordinary households.

 The first AGM of the Great Glen Energy Cooperative has just taken place. The AGM highlighted some initial key goals including spending on education for local schools on the importance of renewables. Another key goal of the cooperative will be to provide a grant for those households most in need of assistance with energy bills.

 However the AGM noted the difficulty in identifying those most in need of support with their bills, caused mostly because of the diversity of suppliers offering varying excessively priced supplies of electricity (and gas). Personally I hope those in the Great Glen Energy Co-op area struggling with high energy bills remains a priority for the co-op, but there are difficulties to overcome. Suggestions for action would be welcomed by readers of DGS.  In the meantime there are plans for another Scottish wide cooperative. The project is to be called “Caledonia”. This should be welcomed, although share offers will doubtlessly be limited in size. Nonetheless it is a step in the correct direction within the current overall domination of corporate malfeasance in the energy sector. There are currently eight Energy4all wind farm cooperatives either operating or under planning in Scotland. So far the Millennium Wind Farm has saved burning 33,376 tons of carbon, in just three months and generated 67 MWh of electricity enough for more than 10,000 homes. It is in inspiration and just a drop in the ocean to what could be achieved with a fully developed publicly owned energy company and strategy.

 

Steve Mowat

   
   
 
 
 
     
 
   
 

Please send your letters by e-mail to democraticgreensocialist@talktalk.net

 
   
   

Dear DGS,

 I was glad to read in the last issue that you are going to be covering Burns.  Just thought I would share with you a little piece of Burns I came across a few years back and which means a lot to me.  It shows, I think, yet another of the ways in which he was head of time

 “While Europe’s eye is fixed on mighty things
The fate of empires and the fall of kings
While quacks of state must each produce his plan
And even children lisp the Rights of Man
Amid this mighty fuss just let me mention
The Rights of Women merit some attention.”

Keep up the good work. I hope you are in a position to produce your magazine more regularly soon. Two months is too long to wait between issues!

 yours in socialism,

 

Jo Shepard. 


Dear DGS,

 I often go online to DGS and must say that I enjoy the articles in it.

 I`m particularly interested in politics, science, art & music and a loads of other subjects.  I’ve enjoyed articles about Beethoven (he is one of my favourite composers). Other stuff I thought was good – Mars - extremely interesting, R.D Laing, Darwinism - fascinating, and one about Arthur C Clark where I found out things about the man I hadn’t known before. I find the analyses spot on. Also, just to let you know, I agree with Anne MacLeod`s letter about Tommy appearing in Big Brother. I think if he Tommy wants to appear in a TV show good luck to him.

 I’ve found all of these items in DGS so far very thought provoking and eclectic and look forward to the next issue.

 How about an article on Humanism and its relevance to contemporary society?

 Yours  fraternally

N J Lindsay