| Well
today I am recovering after the
Glasgow North East
by-election. I was at the count
until 2 am confronting the 10 or
so BNP activists who the media
had spent plenty of time
covering. There are
probably pictures of me shouting
at the Nazis after the count on
the BBC News24 coverage.
One of them told me You
will never be British. No
doubt I'll be on fascist websites
like Redwatch. Many people
will be shocked and disappointed
at this result - it was a real
scare but when you analyse it,
the BNP in fact still
got very few votes - 1,013 out of
20,595 who voted yesterday. It
was in near perfect circumstances
for them and they still
didnt make any major
breakthrough.
The
BNP did run the Tories close
for 3rd place ( I have never seen
so many socialists shake the
hands of Tory activists) but in
the end they still lost their
deposit and only got 4.9%. The
only major advance the BNP
can claim is that they
beat the far-left as the
anti-establishment vote in
Springburn. Tommy Sheridan
of Solidarity-Scotland's
Socialist Movement came 5th
with 794 votes easily beating the
Lib-Dems on 474 and the
Greens on 332 as well as the
Scottish Socialist Party on
152 and the Socialist Labour
Party on 47 votes.
We are still
able to say that BNP support in
Scotland is much lower than in
England and Wales with Glasgow
their highest showing ever but it
means we can no longer be
complacent about racism and
Islamophobia and the issues
associated with it in Scotland.
The main parties have failed
miserably to inspire people to
vote for their policies in what
is the lowest ever turnout
for a UK by-election at 33%.
Labour
won easily because
it successfully campaigned
as an opposition party on the SNP
Scottish Government's
recent record despite the
fact this was a Westminster
by-election. Gordon Brown was let
off the hook totally. The
fact that "Lord"
Michael Martin's record of
corruption over expenses was
almost not mentioned as the
cause of the by-election meant
Labour's record in office also
went unchallenged. The other
parties maintained a polite
silence over attacking him during
the campaign.
Willie Bain
(now MP) was Martin's bag-carrier
in the 2005 election and is a
long-standing student union hack
- and parliamentary research for
a Westminster Labour MP who lives
a lot of the time in London
already. Certainly not the
naive non-politician his campaign
painted him to be. Indeed his
election literature almost failed
to mention that he actually was
the Labour candidate - the
party's logo did not appear on
them. Instead a paper called the
Local Voice portrayed Bain almost
as an independent on-party
candidate fighting
opportunistically against SNP
Holyrood cuts.
Holyrood
stuff dominated in a very
negative anti-SNP campaign by
Labour accusing them
(falsely as it turns out) of
'Ripping Off Glasgow'; when in
fact the city does get a
disproportionately higher
percentage of Scottish Government
money (16% of spending for 13% of
the population) for the obvious
reasons of poverty and greater
need.
Labour won
so easily with the SNP a
poor second partly because their
candidate was simply too middle
class and unapproachable for the
working class voters of
Springburn. The SNP in
response failed miserably to run
a suitably anti-Westminster,
pro-working class campaign
and with the candidate being a
supporter of SNP mainstream
pro-market ideology - they did
not fight the election as a
left-wing, pro-public services
campaign as they had in
Glasgow East in 2008.
The
highlights of the campaign
for me was seeing Tommy
Sheridan and George Galloway
doing four public meetings in a
day on Tuesday speaking to over
300 people in Sighthill, North
Glasgow College, Royston, and
Dennistoun. I chaired the meeting
in Sighthill and I must say with
two left-wing firebrands either
side of me - the volume did
damage my hearing a little!
Plenty of locals agreed with our
message and joined Solidarity. I
also organised a Tenants Question
Time on Monday night in Sighthill
(my estate) and it was the four
main parties plus John Smeaton
and Tommy Sheridan and Mikey
Hughes from Big Brother - with me
playing Dimbleby in the chair.
They all said it was the best
actual debate of the campaign and
the only one within a local
community with Tommy wiping the
floor with the other in terms of
arguments for socialism.
Ruth
Davidson, the Tory candidate also
did well in that debate and this
may be the reason for her 3rd
place in that she acknowledged
the the Tories had been wrong in
separating earnings linked to
pensions and pledged Cameron
government would restore this
link. She presented a moderate
reasonable face of caring
Conservatism so in some ways
this represents a partial
rehabilitation of the Scottish
Conservatives in easily beating
the Lib-Dems in a seat they came
nowhere in during 2003 and
2007.
So
Why did the BNP do so well? There
was virtually no BNP campaign in
Springburn until the BBC Question
Time appearance of BNP fuehrer
Nick Griffin. So we can all thank
David Dimbleby for the renewed
confidence which saw the BNP
drive its 'lie-lorry' advertising
truck around the area the very
next day and there afterwards. As
I said to the press at the count
Dimblebys free
speech for Nazis has consequences
in the renewed confidence of
racists to walk to street
racially abusing Black people in
Springburn. This in fact occurred
during the campaign when Alex
Salmond and SNP candidate David
Kerr hosted a ceilidh dance in
Sighthill, some of the Black SNP
activists present were
racially abused by drunk
passers-by at the off-licence.
One clear
thing to emerge from the polling
evidence was that in integrated
areas like Sighthill, Royston and
Edgefauld the BNP vote was
very small and once again they
didn't really bother campaigning
there. However they instead won
big support in the strongly
Unionist areas of Dennistoun and
Riddrie -where they campaigned
heavily - and in nearly all
white areas like Balornock and
Barmulloch neighbouring the more
integrated ones.
It is also
obviously some kind of protest
vote by a section of white voters
disenchanted with politicians and
bankers over the recent scandals
but who've fallen for the BNP's
claptrap. However it would be
wrong to say that they
weren't voting for fascists
knowingly. Unite Against
Fascism leafleted around 50%
of the constituency warning
people about the Nazi core and
statements made by BNP leaders.
No these 1,013 voters backed the
BNP precisely because they
were fascists and
therefore consistent racists
and Islamophobes.
But it is
also an indictment of the
alternative opposition parties
that none of them were seen
as any credible alternative to
Labour. Another partial reason
for the left's defeat was the
presence of independent
candidate John Smeaton who gained
only 254 votes but it was enough
to offset the left's challenge.
While Tommy gained four
times as many as the other 2 left
parties combined -
the far-left between on 993
votes between them still
failed to outpoll the BNP for the
first time ever in a Scottish
election.
To put this
result into perspective
- when I stood as Socialist
candidate against Michael Martin
in 2005 getting 1405 votes (4.8%)
and again in 2007 as Solidarity
candidate gaining (4.9%) just as
in previous elections many of
these socialist votes came from
people who didn't agree with
me about revolution. They backed
me standing on a
socialist programme of
working class demands because
these were consistently
pro-working class and human
rights. Similarly a voter may not
be an out-and-out fascist but if
they want to express their
racism they'll vote for the
most consistently anti-immigrant
party - that was the BNP.
It shows
that mainstream parties attempts
to tackle the BNP on its
territory by pandering to their
agenda - always fail miserably
and only serve to legitimise
their arguments. Even worse still
when these are legitimised by
appearances on prime-time TV.
These BNP
voters had the option of voting
for Tommy Sheridan - a well-known
working class fighter,
ex-councillor and ex- MSP -
but instead chose to support the
party blaming Black people,
asylum seekers and immigrants
from Eastern Europe for their
poverty rather then the UK and
Scottish governments who have
created the conditions of poverty
and inequality in which they are
forced to live.
What this
election shows is that the
far-left cannot play around
anymore when it comes to left
unity and when it comes to being
anti-establishment. We cannot
construct yet another failed
left-reformist party or coalition
- people have already tried that.
We must instead construct a
united left anti-capitalist
alternative to capture the
imagination of working class
people seeking answers to the
crisis of working class political
representation.
Graham
Campbell
(Springburn
Solidarity - Glasgow North East)
|