Letters Page

 

 
 

There is a Facebook campaign "Bust the BNP"

 

The BNP has set up a freepost address "British Heritage FREEPOST" which will cost them 42p for every envelope sent.  Worth a bit of writer’s cramp to cost the fascists, I would argue.  Or alternatively, persuade as many people as possible to redirect all their junk mail to them.

Use for it at last!

 

There are now 6,800 members of the group that was only started a few days ago.  Spread as widely as possible. You can go onto the link to see it.  Of course, the fascists are putting their bile across on the site but people are just taking the piss out of them.  I have sent nearly 500 letters to them so far using labels off my printer- few quid to me few hundred to them.              

 

I think you can see the group even though you are not on Facebook.  Genius idea and hopefully will cost them a fortune.  I don't think they will reply but sending each freepost letter to them costs them 42p.  

 

I'm planning sending some packages with body glitter on them that is very pretty on but impossible to get off - sparkly fascists!!!!!    Very silly, but great fun.  People are sending them all sorts.

 

Go to

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=180043582916

and check it out.

Anne Macleod. DGS and Highlands Solidarity


Well today I am recovering after the Glasgow North East by-election. I was at the count until 2 am confronting the 10 or so BNP activists who the media had spent plenty of time covering.  There are probably pictures of me shouting at the Nazis after the count on the BBC News24 coverage.  One of them told me “You will never be British”. No doubt I'll be on fascist websites like Redwatch.

Many people will be shocked and disappointed at this result - it was a real scare but when you analyse it, the BNP in fact still got very few votes - 1,013 out of 20,595 who voted yesterday. It was in near perfect circumstances for them and they still didn’t make any major breakthrough.

The BNP did run the Tories close for 3rd place ( I have never seen so many socialists shake the hands of Tory activists) but in the end they still lost their deposit and only got 4.9%. The only major advance the BNP can claim is that they beat the far-left as the anti-establishment vote in Springburn. Tommy Sheridan of Solidarity-Scotland's Socialist Movement came 5th with 794 votes easily beating the Lib-Dems on 474 and the Greens on 332 as well as the Scottish Socialist Party on 152 and the Socialist Labour Party on 47 votes.  

We are still able to say that BNP support in Scotland is much lower than in England and Wales with Glasgow their highest showing ever but it means we can no longer be complacent about racism and Islamophobia and the issues associated with it in Scotland. The main parties have failed miserably to inspire people to vote for their policies in what is the lowest ever turnout for a UK by-election at 33%.

Labour won easily because it successfully campaigned as an opposition party on the SNP Scottish Government's recent record despite the fact this was a Westminster by-election. Gordon Brown was let off the hook totally.  The fact that "Lord" Michael Martin's record of corruption over expenses was almost not mentioned as the cause of the by-election meant Labour's record in office also went unchallenged. The other parties maintained a polite silence over attacking him during the campaign.

Willie Bain (now MP) was Martin's bag-carrier in the 2005 election and is a long-standing student union hack - and parliamentary research for a Westminster Labour MP who lives a lot of the time in London already. Certainly not the naive non-politician his campaign painted him to be. Indeed his election literature almost failed to mention that he actually was the Labour candidate - the party's logo did not appear on them. Instead a paper called the Local Voice portrayed Bain almost as an independent on-party candidate fighting opportunistically against SNP Holyrood cuts.

Holyrood stuff dominated in a very negative anti-SNP campaign by Labour accusing them (falsely as it turns out) of 'Ripping Off Glasgow'; when in fact the city does get a disproportionately higher percentage of Scottish Government money (16% of spending for 13% of the population) for the obvious reasons of poverty and greater need.

Labour won so easily with the SNP a poor second partly because their candidate was simply too middle class and unapproachable for the working class voters of Springburn. The SNP in response failed miserably to run a suitably anti-Westminster, pro-working class campaign and with the candidate being a supporter of SNP mainstream pro-market ideology - they did not fight the election as a left-wing, pro-public services campaign as they had in Glasgow East in 2008.

The highlights of the campaign for me was seeing Tommy Sheridan and George Galloway doing four public meetings in a day on Tuesday speaking to over 300 people in Sighthill, North Glasgow College, Royston, and Dennistoun. I chaired the meeting in Sighthill and I must say with two left-wing firebrands either side of me - the volume did damage my hearing a little!  Plenty of locals agreed with our message and joined Solidarity. I also organised a Tenants Question Time on Monday night in Sighthill (my estate) and it was the four main parties plus John Smeaton and Tommy Sheridan and Mikey Hughes from Big Brother - with me playing Dimbleby in the chair. They all said it was the best actual debate of the campaign and the only one within a local community with Tommy wiping the floor with the other in terms of arguments for socialism.

Ruth Davidson, the Tory candidate also did well in that debate and this may be the reason for her 3rd place in that she acknowledged the the Tories had been wrong in separating earnings linked to pensions and pledged Cameron government would restore this link. She presented a moderate reasonable face of caring Conservatism so in some ways this represents a partial rehabilitation of the Scottish Conservatives in easily beating the Lib-Dems in a seat they came nowhere in during 2003 and 2007.

So Why did the BNP do so well? There was virtually no BNP campaign in Springburn until the BBC Question Time appearance of BNP fuehrer Nick Griffin. So we can all thank David Dimbleby for the renewed confidence which saw the BNP drive its 'lie-lorry' advertising truck around the area the very next day and there afterwards. As I said to the press at the count – Dimbleby’s free speech for Nazis has consequences in the renewed confidence of racists to walk to street racially abusing Black people in Springburn. This in fact occurred during the campaign when Alex Salmond and SNP candidate David Kerr hosted a ceilidh dance in Sighthill, some of the Black SNP activists present were racially abused by drunk passers-by at the off-licence.

One clear thing to emerge from the polling evidence was that in integrated areas like Sighthill, Royston and Edgefauld the BNP vote was very small and once again they didn't really bother campaigning there. However they instead won big support in the strongly Unionist areas of Dennistoun and Riddrie -where they campaigned heavily - and in nearly all white areas like Balornock and Barmulloch neighbouring the more integrated ones. 

It is also obviously some kind of protest vote by a section of white voters disenchanted with politicians and bankers over the recent scandals but who've fallen for the BNP's claptrap. However it would be wrong to say that they weren't voting for fascists knowingly. Unite Against Fascism leafleted around 50% of the constituency warning people about the Nazi core and statements made by BNP leaders. No these 1,013 voters backed the BNP precisely because they were fascists and therefore consistent racists and Islamophobes.

But it is also an indictment of the alternative opposition parties that none of them were seen as any credible alternative to Labour. Another partial reason for the left's defeat was the presence of independent candidate John Smeaton who gained only 254 votes but it was enough to offset the left's challenge. While Tommy gained four times as many as the other 2 left parties combined - the far-left between on 993 votes between them still failed to outpoll the BNP for the first time ever in a Scottish election.

To put this result into perspective - when I stood as Socialist candidate against Michael Martin in 2005 getting 1405 votes (4.8%) and again in 2007 as Solidarity candidate gaining (4.9%) just as in previous elections many of these socialist votes came from people who didn't agree with me about revolution. They backed me standing on a socialist programme of working class demands because these were consistently pro-working class and human rights. Similarly a voter may not be an out-and-out fascist but if they want to express their racism they'll vote for the most consistently anti-immigrant party - that was the BNP.

It shows that mainstream parties attempts to tackle the BNP on its territory by pandering to their agenda - always fail miserably and only serve to legitimise their arguments. Even worse still when these are legitimised by appearances on prime-time TV.

These BNP voters had the option of voting for Tommy Sheridan - a well-known working class fighter, ex-councillor and ex- MSP - but instead chose to support the party blaming Black people, asylum seekers and immigrants from Eastern Europe for their poverty rather then the UK and Scottish governments who have created the conditions of poverty and inequality in which they are forced to live.

What this election shows is that the far-left cannot play around anymore when it comes to left unity and when it comes to being anti-establishment. We cannot construct yet another failed left-reformist party or coalition - people have already tried that. We must instead construct a united left anti-capitalist alternative to capture the imagination of working class people seeking answers to the crisis of working class political representation.

Graham Campbell

(Springburn Solidarity - Glasgow North East)

 
   
 
 
 
 
Dear Comrade,

The BNP make a great show about opposing immigration, as if everyone except their opponents know it to be a bad thing.

Perhaps it is, and perhaps everybody knows this - except me.

Why should immigration be bad? I can imagine three reasons why it might be.

1 Overpopulation. Can we afford to have more people in this country? This would depend on haw many people we ought to have here, and do we know this? Perhaps the government set up a commission to decide this?  What should be done if it were discovered that we have too many inhabitants already? Who should we deport? The BNP?

2 Unemployment. If there is a shortage of certain jobs, such as engineering would it help to deport Polish plumbers or Indian curry cooks?

3 Danger to our culture. What culture? How about religion? Some people object to Islam taking roots here. Mind you, nobody seems to object to Christianity which was imported from the same part of the world.

Until these questions can be answered what can be said about the subject? 

Like Darwin said, “Certainty is more easily derived from ignorance than from knowledge.

Yours fraternally

GEOFF SKEET


Letter to the Editor

 

I have followed the debate on DGS between Gary Fraser and John Wight with great interest. For me, Wight as a Marxist wins hands down. Fraser comes across as a middle class intellectual and as I said in a previous piece most of what he writes would be not be understood by most working class people. In fact, inherent in Fraser's writing is a typical middle class fear of real democracy and working class power.

 His writing on evolutionary psychology borders on being right wing. Does he really believe that people are poor because it is hereditary or part of their genetic make up? 

 I find it bizarre that Gary Fraser consistently attacks Marxists, accusing us of being authoritarian and anti-democratic yet he is a member of a party which in the main consists of two Marxist groups - the CWI and SWP.

 Perhaps Gary regrets leaving the SSP? Is it not time for the DGS to admit that Sheridan's decision to leave the Scottish Socialists was a catastrophic mistake. Surely any serious attempt at left unity has to acknowledge that mistakes have been made on all sides.

 

Frank Williams


Left Unity

 

The recent results for the left in Glasgow only serve to highlight once again the need for left unity. I congratulate your magazine for making this call time and time again in the past year. You are correct to point out that two socialist parties fighting for less than 4% of the vote on an identical programme gets us nowhere. Most people actually look on with contempt.

 I understand that the Solidarity leadership approached the SSP to seek unity and this was rejected. In the case of the SSP this is not good enough. And if we are to believe the SSP leadership no unity will take place this side of Sheridan’s court case which means that if the SSP leadership gets its way the left will be standing against one another next year at the General Election.

 Is it not high time that common sense prevails? I appeal to all activists, particularly those in the SSP to put pressure on their leadership to engage in serious discussions about some form of electoral unity. Now that Fascists are defeating the left and Tommy Sheridan in his home turf there simply is no other choice.

 

David Johnston

Edinburgh   

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Please send your letters by e-mail to democraticgreensocialist@talktalk.net